<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til Musings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blatryk.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Rikke Baggesen&#039;s musings on online exhibitions, digital media and museums / Arbejdstegninger til speciale om digital museumsformidling og webudstillinger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Idegenerering af rikkebaggesen</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/03/24/idegenerering/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>rikkebaggesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=75#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Har lige erfaret at den korrekte betegnelse for værktøjet er IDEKU – se mere på http://www.alt4kreativ.dk/39058</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Har lige erfaret at den korrekte betegnelse for værktøjet er IDEKU – se mere på <a href="http://www.alt4kreativ.dk/39058" rel="nofollow">http://www.alt4kreativ.dk/39058</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Sudoku af rikkebaggesen</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/03/17/sudoku/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>rikkebaggesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Har lige erfaret at den korrekte betegnelse for værktøjet er IDEKU - se mere på http://www.alt4kreativ.dk/39058</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Har lige erfaret at den korrekte betegnelse for værktøjet er IDEKU &#8211; se mere på <a href="http://www.alt4kreativ.dk/39058" rel="nofollow">http://www.alt4kreativ.dk/39058</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Social media @MW2009 af rikkebaggesen</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/social-media-mw2009/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>rikkebaggesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=144#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Hi Isabel, 
Great that you saw this presentation (by Sherry Turkle, wasn&#039;t it?). Do you know of anywhere that I can acces the paper? I&#039;d actually read about the presentation in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://museumtwo.blogspot.com/2009/05/aam-recap-slides-observations-and.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blogpost&lt;/a&gt; by Nina Simon, who questions Turkle&#039;s point, and thought this was an interesting thread to follow. As you can see in my most recent &#039;Project ethos&#039; post, this whole discourse on objects, aura and online representation is central to my thesis, so I&#039;m really looking forward to hearing more about it. See you Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Isabel,<br />
Great that you saw this presentation (by Sherry Turkle, wasn&#8217;t it?). Do you know of anywhere that I can acces the paper? I&#8217;d actually read about the presentation in a <a href="http://museumtwo.blogspot.com/2009/05/aam-recap-slides-observations-and.html" rel="nofollow">blogpost</a> by Nina Simon, who questions Turkle&#8217;s point, and thought this was an interesting thread to follow. As you can see in my most recent &#8216;Project ethos&#8217; post, this whole discourse on objects, aura and online representation is central to my thesis, so I&#8217;m really looking forward to hearing more about it. See you Thursday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Social media @MW2009 af Isabel</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/social-media-mw2009/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=144#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Dear Rikke,

Totally agree with Susana, I saw the most beautiful and interesting presentation at the conference where I spoke in the US last week. It was about evocative objects and the museum and it really fits with what your posted. I&#039;ll tell you all about it on Thursday when we meet! ;)

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rikke,</p>
<p>Totally agree with Susana, I saw the most beautiful and interesting presentation at the conference where I spoke in the US last week. It was about evocative objects and the museum and it really fits with what your posted. I&#8217;ll tell you all about it on Thursday when we meet! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Virtual Systems and Multimedia Society 2009 af Bernhard Snizek</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/virtual-systems-and-multimedia-society-2009/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard Snizek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 07:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=154#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Very cool indeed, If you need a place to stay in Vienna, just tell me ! We are going as well ! 

/B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool indeed, If you need a place to stay in Vienna, just tell me ! We are going as well ! </p>
<p>/B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Hey Danmark! af rikkebaggesen</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/hey-danmark/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>rikkebaggesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=151#comment-29</guid>
		<description>@Bernhard: Sure, I&#039;d love to show and tell and discuss the current trends, that would be really great - will you then also tell me more about your projects and studio? What a shame MW didn&#039;t accept your paper - looking at the project description on Formidlingsnettet, I was actually thinking how perfect it would have been for the conference. 

@both: Yes, I know, there are lots of interesting projects going on in the Danish museum world - Det Digitale SMK springs to mind, Arbejdermuseet has built a virtual world around Carlsberg, Tilbygningen at Thorvaldsens uses interactive storytelling, Struer Museum invites user participation (albeit not through the use of social media), looking forward to seeing Brede Værk in action come May etc. - and there are probably loads of projects that I am not aware of (so maybe I&#039;m the one who should look around before critizicing).
And maybe the innovators of the museum world are not actually the worst culprits; it&#039;s just this general consensus in Denmark that we hold the patent for getting it right that means we are sometimes less inclined to take inspiration from others.
Either way, I would have loved to see some more Danish institutions represented at the conference. To showcase our best work and most innovative ideas in order to get feedback from professionals with relevant experience and to boost our culture/innovation profile. And because there are so many sessions and discussions going at the conference, that it would have been great to bring home more than one perspective, to be able to continue the discussion back in Denmark. Even for networking with each other; I know that was a great benefit for the Dutch contingency, although of course crossing the Atlantic to meet up with your colleagues is a luxury you can&#039;t afford on public funding. Still the solution might be to allocate public funding for international knowledgesharing, so that each instituition would not have to find the funds in their own too-meagre budgets.
As for the paper article, I&#039;m not sure if I&#039;m still too much of an upstart outsider to spark that debate, both with regards to authority and impact, and not least that it could be a very bad career move...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bernhard: Sure, I&#8217;d love to show and tell and discuss the current trends, that would be really great &#8211; will you then also tell me more about your projects and studio? What a shame MW didn&#8217;t accept your paper &#8211; looking at the project description on Formidlingsnettet, I was actually thinking how perfect it would have been for the conference. </p>
<p>@both: Yes, I know, there are lots of interesting projects going on in the Danish museum world &#8211; Det Digitale SMK springs to mind, Arbejdermuseet has built a virtual world around Carlsberg, Tilbygningen at Thorvaldsens uses interactive storytelling, Struer Museum invites user participation (albeit not through the use of social media), looking forward to seeing Brede Værk in action come May etc. &#8211; and there are probably loads of projects that I am not aware of (so maybe I&#8217;m the one who should look around before critizicing).<br />
And maybe the innovators of the museum world are not actually the worst culprits; it&#8217;s just this general consensus in Denmark that we hold the patent for getting it right that means we are sometimes less inclined to take inspiration from others.<br />
Either way, I would have loved to see some more Danish institutions represented at the conference. To showcase our best work and most innovative ideas in order to get feedback from professionals with relevant experience and to boost our culture/innovation profile. And because there are so many sessions and discussions going at the conference, that it would have been great to bring home more than one perspective, to be able to continue the discussion back in Denmark. Even for networking with each other; I know that was a great benefit for the Dutch contingency, although of course crossing the Atlantic to meet up with your colleagues is a luxury you can&#8217;t afford on public funding. Still the solution might be to allocate public funding for international knowledgesharing, so that each instituition would not have to find the funds in their own too-meagre budgets.<br />
As for the paper article, I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m still too much of an upstart outsider to spark that debate, both with regards to authority and impact, and not least that it could be a very bad career move&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Hey Danmark! af Bernhard Snizek</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/hey-danmark/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard Snizek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=151#comment-28</guid>
		<description>It is actually not quite that bad, there&#039;s some institutions who are actually building web 2.0 sites here, which are quite advanced ... 

I cannot tell why Politiken calls the &quot;Culture Pearls&quot; a world sensation, could be due to cut and paste from a little too positive press release ... 

Writing a short article to one of the bigger papers sounds like a really good idea, if you want to, Rikke, I am in :) 

Anyway, could you get back to me when you get back, I would love to invite you for a lunch at a place of your choice and hear a little more about the conference, the current trends and of course your master&#039;s thesis: bs [at] koenigsnizek [döt] .org . I tried to submit a paper there too but wasn&#039;t admitted, they&#039;d rather had non-public players buy a booth at the exhibition which was a little to expensive for my taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is actually not quite that bad, there&#8217;s some institutions who are actually building web 2.0 sites here, which are quite advanced &#8230; </p>
<p>I cannot tell why Politiken calls the &#8220;Culture Pearls&#8221; a world sensation, could be due to cut and paste from a little too positive press release &#8230; </p>
<p>Writing a short article to one of the bigger papers sounds like a really good idea, if you want to, Rikke, I am in <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Anyway, could you get back to me when you get back, I would love to invite you for a lunch at a place of your choice and hear a little more about the conference, the current trends and of course your master&#8217;s thesis: bs [at] koenigsnizek [döt] .org . I tried to submit a paper there too but wasn&#8217;t admitted, they&#8217;d rather had non-public players buy a booth at the exhibition which was a little to expensive for my taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Hey Danmark! af Susana Tosca</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/hey-danmark/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Susana Tosca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=151#comment-26</guid>
		<description>OK, it might be &quot;biting the hand...&quot; ;-) but I think it is a necessary critique and reflection about something that is really important. And it strikes me as very weird too. Coming from digitally third-worldish spain, it doesnt surprise me none of our museums were there, but danmark? You have some great museums and great innovations in the way they interact with the public so I cant understand danmark is halting behind and thinking a static website is the seventh wonder of the world!!! I think this could be re-written a little bit and send as letter to a big culture section of a dk newspaper, really, to spark the debate around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it might be &#8220;biting the hand&#8230;&#8221; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  but I think it is a necessary critique and reflection about something that is really important. And it strikes me as very weird too. Coming from digitally third-worldish spain, it doesnt surprise me none of our museums were there, but danmark? You have some great museums and great innovations in the way they interact with the public so I cant understand danmark is halting behind and thinking a static website is the seventh wonder of the world!!! I think this could be re-written a little bit and send as letter to a big culture section of a dk newspaper, really, to spark the debate around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Handheld handbook @MW2009 af Susana Tosca</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/handheld-handbook-mw2009/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Susana Tosca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=146#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hey that was a great resource link, I have read a couple of papers from the wiki (like the fantastic one about a location based game in the Tower of London) and it is really inspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey that was a great resource link, I have read a couple of papers from the wiki (like the fantastic one about a location based game in the Tower of London) and it is really inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentar til Social media @MW2009 af Susana Tosca</title>
		<link>http://blatryk.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/social-media-mw2009/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Susana Tosca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blatryk.wordpress.com/?p=144#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I was thinking about this post that sometimes you dont need high tech to do very innovative interaction. I mean, Durbins idea makes use of &quot;everyday&quot; technologies and seem to combine them in a creative way that can involve people effectively. This is an example of a forward way of thinking that is affordable, and we can contrast it with the idea that advanced digital interaction has to be about moving towards virtual reality or other very expensive developments that require huge investments in design, production and hardware. It reminds me of a discussion in computer games research about a part of the industry being enormously techno-fetichist, thinking that all worthwhile developments will come from better machines, better AI, better graphic cards, more realistic environments; while others experiment with lesser technological means and more interesting ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about this post that sometimes you dont need high tech to do very innovative interaction. I mean, Durbins idea makes use of &#8220;everyday&#8221; technologies and seem to combine them in a creative way that can involve people effectively. This is an example of a forward way of thinking that is affordable, and we can contrast it with the idea that advanced digital interaction has to be about moving towards virtual reality or other very expensive developments that require huge investments in design, production and hardware. It reminds me of a discussion in computer games research about a part of the industry being enormously techno-fetichist, thinking that all worthwhile developments will come from better machines, better AI, better graphic cards, more realistic environments; while others experiment with lesser technological means and more interesting ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
